|
|
||||||||||||
| HELP | Results Form January 18 | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
| Date of Match | Division / Competition | 2 | ||||||||||
| Date | ||||||||||||
| Home | Team | Away | Team | |||||||||
| Hastings | 3 | Uckfield | 1 | |||||||||
| 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Grade | Player | Result | Player | Grade | ||||||||
| 1 | 162 | Ruane, Brendan J | 1/2 | – | 1/2 | Patrick, Chaski | 192 | |||||
| 2 | 140 | Bryant, Marc A | 0 | – | 1 | Attree, Mark C | 142 | |||||
| 3 | 130 | Hann, Chris N | 1 | – | 0 | Airlie, Arran | 139 | |||||
| 4 | 123 | Cosens, Derek | 0 | – | 1 | McDonald, Simon | 136 | |||||
| 5 | 119 | Cload, Adrian | 1 | – | 0 | Stockham, Brian | 127 | |||||
| 2 1/2 | 2 1/2 | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
| Board | Name | Home Away | Estimated Grade | Comments | ||||||||
m
Division 2 Results
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | plyd | MP | GP | DP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hastings & St Leonards 2 | xxx | 4 | 4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 25 | 0 | ||
| 2 | Horsham 3 | 1 | xxx | 3 | 2.5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4.5 | 17.5 | 0 | ||
| 4 | Woodpushers 1 | 2 | xxx | 3 | 1.5 | 3 | 4 | 4.5 | 6 | 4 | 18 | 1 | ||
| 5 | Horsham 2 | 1 | 2.5 | 2 | xxx | 4 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 6 | 3.5 | 17.5 | 0 | ||
| 3 | Hastings & St Leonards 3 | 0.5 | 2 | 3.5 | 1 | xxx | 3 | 3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 7 | 4 | 18 | 0 |
| 6 | Crowborough | 0.5 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | xxx | 3.5 | 4 | 3.5 | 7 | 3 | 17 | 0 | |
| 8 | Eastbourne 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.5 | xxx | 2.5 | 5 | 7 | 1.5 | 14 | 5 | |
| 7 | Uckfield 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 2.5 | xxx | 3 | 5 | 2 | 10.5 | 1 | ||
| 9 | Lewes 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 2 | xxx | 6 | 0.5 | 7.5 | 1 |
This game score with its fascinating final mate
I see from the League site that the loser is actually called Arran Ainslie. He played a few moves beyond the 42-move deadline as he had a series of ticks over the last ten moves or so and did not know he had safely reached the time control! Bernard
——– F
A Attan v C Hann Hastings3 Board3
Date:
Thu, 8 Mar 2018 17:41:35 +0000
Thanks for your interest in the game.After whites 34th move this was reconstructed from memory & there may have been repetitions for time purposes in the game but the gist is correct.
1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 g6 3.d3 Bg7 4.Nf3 O-O 5.g3 d6 6. Bg2 Nbd7 7.O-O e5 8.Bg5 c6 9.Rb1 a5 10.a3 Nc5 11.Qd2 Re8 12. b4 axb 13.axb Ne6 14.Bh6 Bh8 15. Qc2 Ng4 16.Bd2 f5 17. e3 Nf6 18.b5 Bd7 19.Bc1 Nc5 20.Nd2 Qe7 21.d4 Nce4 22. dxe Qe5 23. Ncxe4 Nxe4 24. Bb2 Ra2 25.Qxe4 Rxb2 26.Qxe5 Bxe5 27.Rxb2 Bxb2 28.Rb1 Bc3 29.Nb3 Rc8 30.Rd1 Bb4 31. Nd4 cxb 32.Nxb Bxb5 33. cxb5 b6 34. Bc6 Bc5 35. Kg2 Kg7 36.f4 Kf6 37.Kf3 Rc7 38.e4 fxe 39. Bxe4 Ra7 40.Rd3 Ra2 41.h3 h5 42.g4 Rf2 43. Kg3 Rb7 44.Bc6 Re2 45.Bf3 h4+46. Resigns
After move 34 I switched to cheapo mode as I knew we needed a win & the opposite bishops left too few chances. 41. …h5 was intended to follow the same combination theme but using the rook to mate. I think it may come under attraction or decoy in the manuals on combinations but its a bit hybrid & the themes are not as classifiable as stategic ones.
I will try to find the position that put the theme in my head as it is probably being used in harmony with the position rather than as a desperation measure.
Up the Rovers!
Chris